229 Md. App. 295 - Kunda v. Morse’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Scott v. Jenkins · 177 Md. App. 562 - Minh-Vu Hoang v. Hewitt Avenue Associates, LLC · Roth v. Dimensions Health Corp. · Clickner v. Magothy River Ass'n · Mraz v. COUNTY COMM'RS OF CECIL CTY.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“defer to the trial court's findings of fact, and will not disturb those findings unless they are clearly erroneous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.