229 Md. App. 687 - Perry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Albrecht · Klauenberg v. State · State v. Smith · Thomas v. State · Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, there must be an error or defect[-]some sort of deviation from a legal rule[-]that has not been intentionally relinquished or abandoned ... by the [defendant]. Second, the legal error must be clear or obvious, rather than subject to reasonable dispute. Third, the error must have affected the [defendant]'s substantial rights, which ... means [that the defendant] must demonstrate that [the error] affected the outcome of the [trial] court proceedings. Fourth and finally, if the above three prongs are satisfied, the [appellate court] has the discretion to remedy the error[-]discretion [that] ought to be exercised only if the error seriously affects the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings. Meeting all four prongs is difficult, as it should be.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“CL § 3-204(a), provides, in relevant part: (a) A person may not recklessly: (1) engage in conduct that creates a substantial risk of death or serious physical injury[ 4 ] to another[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.