229 Mich. App. 608 - Manning v. Amerman’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2017
3 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“exclusive legal and equitable jurisdiction”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“tortious interference with a prospective advantage/expectancy, tortious interference with a trust/contractual relationship, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, legal malpractice, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lepard v. NBD Bank
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.