Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 229 Minn. 408 - Suske v. Straka

Suske v. Straka’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood (1962), Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp. (1960)

3 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

80194919501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wilentz v. Hendrickson · Chipman v. . Montgomery · McGovern v. . City of New York · Ryan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. · Estrada v. Hanson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Absent a contrary agreement, acceptance by the transferee of a transfer of property is one according to the terms thereof. The acceptance operates as a representation by the transferee that he accedes to the terms of the transaction as is. A party who is free to accept or reject without serious inconvenience cannot accept and retain the benefits of a transaction and at the same time repudiate it. The transferee in such a case should be held not only to adopt the transaction as a whole, but also to renounce every right inconsistent therewith.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The consideration for a promise, whether it be some benefit accruing to one party or some detriment suffered by the other * * * or something else * * * must be something which both parties to the contract have adopted and regarded as such.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““* * * Many things may constitute the consideration for a contract. It is the fact that they are the intended consideration that imports them into a contract.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.