Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 229 Mo. App. 1056 - Power v. Frischer

229 Mo. App. 1056 - Power v. Frischer’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 1977
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Banks v. Morris Company · Markowitz v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. · Goodson v. Schwandt · 226 Mo. App. 1090 - Cervillo v. Manhattan Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The record does not show that defendant objected to any of the questions asked by plaintiff's counsel in the examination of the panel of jurors or that defendant requested the trial judge to discharge the panel. The record discloses that after plaintiff's counsel completed his examination and announced that the panel was acceptable to him, counsel for defendant said:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.