Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 229 N.C. 503 - Wright Ex Rel. Wright v. Wright

Wright Ex Rel. Wright v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
6
states following
August 2005
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently August 2005 · most notably Hunsucker v. High Point Bending & Chair Co. (1953), Cox v. Shaw (1965)

9 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

1201948195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schubert v. August Schubert Wagon Co. · Dunlap v. Dunlap · Small Ex Rel. Balthis v. Morrison · Chase v. New Haven Waste Material Corporation · McLaurin v. McLaurin Furniture Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well-settled law that an employer who, by reason of his calling or the business in which he is engaged, owes special legal duties and obligations to the public or to those with whom there exists some contractual relation cannot shirk or evade such special duties and obligations by committing its performance to another; he is bound absolutely to perform the obligation, and he is liable for a failure to do so in any respect whereby injury results to others, whether such failure results from negligence or from wilful, wanton, or criminal conduct of the employee or agent to whom the duty has been committed. Being bound to do the act or perform the duty, if he does it by another the employer is treated as having done it himself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.