Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 229 NCAPP 155 - Tyll v. Willets

Tyll v. Willets’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schoolfield v. Collins · 135 N.C. App. 124 - Bledsoe v. County of Wilkes · 215 N.C. App. 495 - Romulus v. Romulus · 201 N.C. App. 270 - Cunningham v. Selman · 169 N.C. App. 331 - State v. Watson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even if defendant's actions were annoying to plaintiff and thus constituted harassment, plaintiff has not alleged any facts sufficient to sustain a finding that defendant caused plaintiff to suffer substantial emotional distress.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[s]ignificant mental suffering or distress that may, but does not necessarily, require medical or other professional treatment or counseling.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he standard of review on appeal is whether there was competent evidence to support the trial court's findings of fact and whether its conclusions of law were proper in light of such facts”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.