Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 229 NCAPP 593 - State v. Marlow

State v. Marlow’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Missouri v. Hunter · State v. Odom · State v. Lawrence · United States v. McCaskill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “address the defendant personally and advise the defendant that: (1) He or she is entitled to have a jury determine the existence of any aggravating factors or points under G.S. 15A-1340.14(b)(7); and (2) He or she has the right to prove the existence of any mitigating factors at a sentencing hearing before the sentencing judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[d]efense counsel had the opportunity to inform defendant of the repercussions of conceding certain prior offenses and defendant had the opportunity to interject had he not known such repercussions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.