229 N.J. Super. 459 - State v. Ogar’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 55 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably Commonwealth v. Burns (1990), Dawson v. State (1993)
6 federal appellate · 55 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Allen v. California · Gibbons v. United States · Bush v. Florida · Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any person who violates subsection a. of N.J.S. 2C:35-5 by distributing, dispensing or possessing with intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance or controlled substance analog while on any school property used for school purposes which is owned by, or leased to any elementary or secondary school or school board, or within 1,000 feet of such school property or school bus, or while on any school bus, is guilty of a crime of the third degree and shall, except as provided in N.J.S. 2C:35-12, be sentenced by the court to a term of imprisonment.... [N.J.S.A. 2C:35-7, emphasis added.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Official Commentary to the Comprehensive Drug Reform Act (Laws 1987, Chapter 106),”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“precluded from raising this point as an issue”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.