Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

229 Or. App. 708

214 P.3d 824

State v. Stone

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Brian Keith STONE, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 15, 2009

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 2009-07-15

Applies OR 813 § 813.010

Relies on State v. Durbin · 212 Or. App. 125 - State v. Matviyenko · 221 Or. App. 350 - State v. Sawyer

Decided 2009-07-15

072420FE; A137540.

¶1Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted on June 5, 2009.
Decided July 15, 2009.

¶2Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Appellate Division, and Meredith Allen, Senior Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

¶3John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General, and Susan G. Howe, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

¶4Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6Defendant was convicted of one count of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence of his refusal to take a breath test. According to defendant, the police denied him a reasonable opportunity to consult privately with counsel before deciding whether to submit to the test, thereby violating his rights under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution. State v. Durbin,335 Or. 183, 193-94, 63 P.3d 576 (2003) ("[A] driver arrested for DUII has, upon invoking the right to counsel, the right to a reasonable opportunity to consult privately with counsel before deciding whether to submit to a breath test."). The state concedes the point and acknowledges that the trial court's error requires reversal. We agree and accept the state's concession. State v. Sawyer,221 Or.App. 350, 354-55, 190 P.3d 409 (2008); State v. Matviyenko,212 Or.App. 125, 127-30, 157 P.3d 268 (2007).

¶7Reversed and remanded.

/229/orapp/708 · .json · Public domain