Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

229 Or. App. 92

State v. Bumgarner

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 10, 2009

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 2009-06-10

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2010

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-06-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM

¶1The state petitions this court to reconsider its decision in State v. Bumgarner, 219 Or App 617, 184 P3d 1143, rev den, 345 Or 175 (2008), cert den,_US_, 129 S Ct 927 (2009). In Bumgarner, we affirmed defendant’s convictions but remanded for resentencing. The state now contends that, in light of Oregon v. Ice, 555 US_, 129 S Ct 711, 172 L Ed 2d 517 (2009), we erred in remanding for resentencing. We agree and, accordingly, modify our opinion and affirm.

¶2Reconsideration allowed; former disposition withdrawn; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified; affirmed.

/229/orapp/92 · .json · Public domain