Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 229 PASUPER 273 - Mixer, Inc. v. SMITH

Mixer, Inc. v. SMITH’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
July 1978
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Central Contracting Co. v. C. E. Youngdahl & Co. · Zerbe Township School District v. Thomas · Witney v. Lebanon City · Studio Theaters, Inc. v. Washington · University Square No. 1, Inc. v. Marhoefer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[E]ven though a plaintiff have [sic] no standing to bring his action, even though his complaint be demurrable, even though he fail to establish its allegations, even though the court should finally conclude that the relief he seeks should not be granted, not any or all of these circumstances would enter into, much less determine, the question whether the court had jurisdiction of the litigation.” Id. at 260 , 180 A.2d at 429 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.