Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 229 PASUPER 390 - Commonwealth v. Williams

Commonwealth v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 2025

23 state decisions

160197419801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · 229 Pa. Super. 363 - Commonwealth v. Quarles · Commonwealth v. Murray · Commonwealth v. Reeves · Commonwealth v. Pinno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “■(B) Unless the opportunity did not previously exist, or the interests of justice otherwise require, such motion shall be made only after a case has been returned to court and shall be contained in the omnibus pretrial motion set forth in Rule 578. If timely motion is not made hereunder, the issue of suppression of such evidence shall be deemed to be waived.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.