Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 229 S.C. 101 - Goolsby v. Goolsby

Goolsby v. Goolsby’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1985
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dempsey v. HUSKEY · State v. McNinch · Tompkins v. Tompkins · Thompson v. Moore · Kennedy v. Badgett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Cross examination follows examination in chief by the party who calls the witness. It behooved appellant to produce the affiants as witnesses if she wanted the benefit of their testimony, and let them be subject to cross examination. The latter is a most valuable right. `It is the law of evidence that when a witness has been examined in chief, the other party has a right to cross examine him. * * * The power of cross examination has been justly said to be one of the principal, as it certainly is one of the most efficacious, tests which the law has devised for the discovery of truth.' State v. McNinch , 12 S.C. 89 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.