229 So. 2d 239 - Baggett v. Wainwright’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 201 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 214 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably 569 So. 2d 439 - State v. Dist. Ct. of Appeal, First Dist. (1990), 685 So. 2d 773 - Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc. (1996)
4 federal appellate · 201 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Douglas v. People of State of California · Rodriquez v. United States · Pate v. Holman · 194 So. 2d 577 - Hollingshead v. Wainwright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 214 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * Since where habeas corpus relief is sought to vindicate deprivations of the right to appeal, or necessary incidents thereof, the ultimate relief afforded is the opportunity for full appellate review by way of habeas corpus in the district court of appeal of the district where petitioner was confined at the time of sentencing, the soundest and most expeditious procedure should require the application for a writ challenging such alleged deprivations to be filed in the same district court which is empowered to grant the ultimate relief. * * * ” (Emphasis supplied)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Generally, in the present context, state action is shown when a responsible official in the State's system of justice fails to take proper steps toward affording the necessary incidents of an appeal, e.g., appointment of counsel for a convicted defendant, after the State's duty to act in this particular is activated... .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“effective but expedient procedural machinery for spreading the judicial labor so as not to overburden any particular court or judicial body.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.