¶1Affirmed. See this court’s opinion at 210 So.2d 14. In addition, this is the second motion for similar relief and as noted in the trial judge’s order there has been no new ground set forth by appellant. CrPR 1.850, 3 F.S.A. expressly provides that the sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner.
229 So. 2d 892
Peel v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 9, 1970
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1970-01-09
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 1983
19 state decisions
Relies on Peel v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1970-01-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →