Larson v. Larson’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · Mart v. Hill · McAlpine v. McAlpine · Broussard v. Broussard · State, Department of Social Services v. L.T.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Ms. Larson did not have a motion for final spousal support pending at the judgment of divorce, so her interim spousal support therefore terminated at the rendition of the judgment of divorce[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holly v. Holly“[i]f a claim for final spousal support is pending at the time of the rendition of the judgment of divorce[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holly v. Holly“award of interim spousal support allowance shall terminate upon the rendition of a judgment of divorce.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holly v. Holly
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.