Ex parte Caremark Rx, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 672 So. 2d 497 - Ex Parte Integon Corp. · Ex Parte Dillard Dep't Stores, Inc. · 888 So. 2d 1224 - George v. Sims · Lake Thunderbird Property Owners Ass'n v. Lake Thunderbird, Inc. · 239 Mo. App. 1199 - Camden Ex Rel. Camden v. St. Louis Public Service Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The jurisdiction retained by the trial court after it entered its final judgment ... is limited to interpreting or enforcing that final judgment; the trial court could not extend its jurisdiction over any matter somehow related to the ... final judgment in perpetuity by simply declaring it so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"Although a trial court has 'residual jurisdiction or authority to take certain actions necessary to enforce or interpret a final judgment,' that authority is not so broad as to allow substantive modification of an otherwise effective and unambiguous final order."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Of course, Rule 60(b), Ala. R. Civ. P., provides a mechanism by which a trial court can provide relief beyond that 30-day period in certain extraordinary circumstances ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rogers v. Rogers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.