Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

229 So. 3d 849

Harrell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 8, 2017

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2017-11-08

Relies on 173 So. 3d 957 - Florida Board of Bar Examiners re P.M.A. · 87 So. 3d 1262 - Leighty v. State

Decided 2017-11-08

Per Curiam.

¶1Jesse Cleveland Harrell timely appeals the summary denial of a rule 3.850 motion. Below the state responded that Harrell’s August 5, 2016, motion was untimely filed under rule 3.850 and his claims of score-sheet error did not demonstrate entitlement to relief under rule 3.800(a). The trial court denied the motion based upon the state’s response.

¶2On appeal, the state acknowledges that the August 2016 motion was timely filed within two years after the Florida Supreme Court declined jurisdiction to review Harrell’s direct appeal in Harrell v. State, 173 So.3d 962 (Fla. 2015). See, e.g., Leighty v. State, 87 So.3d 1262 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand for the court to reconsider whether appellant is entitled to relief under rule 3.850.

Gross, Taylor and May, JJ., concur.
/229/so3d/849 · .json · Public domain