229 Wis. 2d 1 - State v. DeRango’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 2023
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger · 93 Wis. 2d 433 - Wirth v. Ehly · 216 Wis. 2d 768 - State v. Sullivan · 96 Wis. 2d 48 - State v. Rabe · 91 Wis. 2d 134 - Holland v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whoever, with intent to commit any of the following acts, causes or attempts to cause any child who has not attained the age of 18 years to go into any vehicle, building, room or secluded place is guilty of a Class BC felony: (1) Having sexual contact or sexual intercourse with the child.... (2) Causing the child to engage in prostitution. (3) Exposing a sex organ to the child or causing the child to expose a sex organ .... (4) Taking a picture or making an audio recording of the child engaging in sexually explicit conduct. (5) Causing bodily or mental harm to the child. (6) Giving or selling to the child a controlled substance or controlled substance analog ....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The crime of enticement is completed . . . when a person causes, or attempts to cause, a child to go to a secluded place . . . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Evidence has been received regarding other conduct of the defendant for which the defendant is not on trial. Specifically, evidence has been received that the defendant had in his possession videotapes showing sexually explicit conduct and a handwritten list. If you find that this conduct did occur, you should consider it only on the issues of motive, opportunity, intent, and preparation or plan. You may not consider this evidence to conclude that the defendant has a certain character or certain character trait and that the defendant acted in conformity with that trait or character with respect to the offense charged in this case. The evidence was received on the issues of motive, that is whether the defendant had a reason to desire the result of the crime, opportunity, that is whether the defendant had the opportunity to commit offense charged, intent that is whether the defendant acted with a state of mind that is required for this offense, preparation or plan, that is whether such other conduct of the defendant was part of a design or scheme that led to the commission of the offense charged. You may consider this evidence only for the purposes I have described, giving to it the weight you determine it deserves. It is not to be used to conclude that the defendant is a bad person and for that reason is guilty of the offense charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Derango
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.