229 Wis. 2d 328 - State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “A party must do more than simply toss a bunch of concepts into the air with the hope that either the trial court or the opposing party will arrange them into viable and fact-supported legal theories.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 386 Wis. 2d 352 - Kilmer v. Foster · 388 Wis. 2d 258 - Jackson Cnty. v. Peplinski

2. ““Miranda does not require that attorneys be producible on call, but only that the suspect be informed, as here, that he has the right to an attorney before and during questioning, and that an attorney would be appointed for him if he could not afford one,” and that if “the police cannot provide appointed counsel, Miranda requires only that the police not question a suspect unless he waives his right to counsel.” This is precisely what the trial court found happened here. Jackson’s argument that he was somehow misled into giving up his Miranda rights because the detective told him that he would be given a public-defender lawyer “once charges were established” is without merit.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 194 F. Supp. 2d 849 - Jackson v. Litscher

3. “The court of appeals also stated that there is neither evidence nor an offer of proof in the record that the detective knew he could have both left Jackson alone to make the call[ 10 ] and gotten the public defender’s office to implement its emergency-appointment procedure. We will not circumvent Duckworth merely because an officer makes an inadvertent comment that later detailed analysis indicates may have been mistaken.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 194 F. Supp. 2d 849 - Jackson v. Litscher