¶1Judgment in an article 78 proceeding entered May 19, 1964, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The record satisfies the court that the landlord knew, or should have known, that the premises were being used primarily for residential purposes, and that the Administrator’s findings, although insufficiently articulated, purported to so find. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
23 A.D.2d 727
Butler v. Gabel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 1, 1965
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1965-04-01
Decided 1965-04-01