¶1Order insofar as appealed from unanimously modified to increase allowance for fees to the -amount of $7,500 for services, plus such actual disbursements as the appellant Averbach can establish as necessary, and as modified affirmed, with costs to appellants. Memorandum: The amount awarded by the Trial Judge was inadequate to fairly compensate the attorney for the complainant for his services. In addition, he should be allowed necessary disbursements. (Appeal by petitioner and attorney from part of order of Onondaga Family Court which orders respondent to pay $4,000 counsel fees, on ground of inadequacy.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Veechio, JJ.
23 A.D.2d 820
Nardone v. Coyne
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 9, 1965
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1965-04-09
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1965-04-09
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably The Washington Post Company v. Eugene J. Keogh (1966), Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. (1985)
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →