¶1Order, entered October 27, 1964, granting defendant, Sperry Rand Corporation’s motion to vacate plaintiff’s notice of examination and denying the cross motion for a limited examination, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that plaintiff should have raised his right to procure an examination by taking an appeal from the prior order denying such examination. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
23 A.D.2d 837
Feeley v. Herman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 18, 1965
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1965-05-18
Decided 1965-05-18