¶1Memorandum by the Court. On this appeal from an award in an appropriation ease, we find no sound basis for the State’s sole contention, which is, that the trial court relied "upon appraisal evidence which does not include an adjustment for essential differences ” between the subject property and the comparables employed. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
23 A.D.2d 911
Chambers v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 6, 1965
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1965-05-06
Decided 1965-05-06