People v. Narrod’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The record establishes that, regardless of the court’s use of the “clear link” language, the court properly applied “the general balancing analysis that governs the admissibility of all evidence” and precluded defendant from presenting the proffered evidence because it was based on mere speculation (People v. Primo, 96 N.Y.2d 351, 356 , 728 N.Y.S.2d 735 , 753 N.E.2d 164 ; see People v. Williams, 291 A.D.2d 897, 897-898 , 737 N.Y.S.2d 737 , lv. denied 97 N.Y.2d 763 , 742 N.Y.S.2d 624 , 769 N.E.2d 370 ; People v. Joaquin, 242 A.D.2d 589, 590 , 664 N.Y.S.2d 735 , lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 893 , 669 N.Y.S.2d 7 , 691 N.E.2d 1033 ).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 763 F. Supp. 2d 359 - Narrod v. Napoli