Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 Ala. App. 620

124 So 920

Day v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1929

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1929-11-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1929

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1929-11-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BRICKEN, P. -J.

¶1 At the fall term, 1927, of the Barbour circuit. court at Clayton, the grand jury returned an indictment against this appellant, charging the offense of violating the prohibition laws of the state by having in possession, etc., prohibited liquors. The trial was held, at the Spring term, 1929, of said court, which resulted in a conviction as charged, and the jury assessed a fine of $250 against the defendant. This appeal was taken from the judgment of conviction which followed the verdict of the jury. Confession of judgment for t,he fine and cost was had.

¶2 This' appeal is upon the record proper, without a bill of exceptions. . We have, as the law requires, examined the record, and have found it regular in all things, and therefore without error. Let the judgment of conviction in the lower court, as rendered, stand affirmed.

¶3 Affirmed.

/23/alaapp/620 · .json · Public domain