Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 Ala. App. 672

121 So 925

Rogers v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1929

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1929-02-05

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1929

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1929-02-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

RICE, J.

¶1 Appellant was convicted of the offense of assault with intent to murder, and sentenced to serve imprisonment in the penitentiary for an indeterminate term of from two to three years.

¶2 The indictment, trial, and conviction appear to be in all things regular. No exceptions, worthy of mention, if, indeed, there were any at all, were reserved on the taking of testimony. The oral charge of the court was unusually full, clear, and explicit. It properly placed before the jury every phase of the case, and in it the court was careful to give appellant the full benefit of every contention made by him from the evidence. There was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial. The judgment is affirmed.

¶3 Affirmed.

/23/alaapp/672 · .json · Public domain