23 Ariz. App. 266 - Lininger v. Sonenblick’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 district · 8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““[s]ince the provision in the statute [of Frauds] prohibiting any action to be brought on an oral contract within the statute includes actions based indirectly on the contract, ‘an action for damages cannot be maintained on the ground of fraud in refusing to perform the contract, even though the defendant at the time of the making of the oral contract may have had no intention of performing it.’ ””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 275 F. Supp. 2d 1013 - Arnold & Associates, Inc. v. Misys Healthcare Systems

2. “1) a representation 2) its falsity 3) its materiality 4) the speaker’s knowledge of its falsity or ignorance of its truth 5) the speaker’s intent that it be acted upon by and in the manner reasonably contemplated 6) the hearer’s ignorance of its falsity 7) the hearer’s reliance upon its truth 8) the hearer’s right to rely thereon, and 9) the hearer’s consequent and proximate injury.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Rhoads v. Harvey Publications, Inc.