23 Ariz. App. 345 - State v. Heasley’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 2006
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Townsend v. Sain · 23 Ariz. App. 45 - State v. Suarez · 23 Ariz. App. 299 - State v. Tash
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Probation shall not be revoked for violation of a condition or regulation of which the probationer has not received a written copy.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robinson · State v. Alves“[a]ll conditions and regulations shall be in writing, and a copy of them given to the probationer.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robinson · State v. Alves“[This rule] provides for modification and clarification of conditions and regulations [of probation]. As pointed out in the Comment to [the rule], its purpose is to protect the probationer from arbitrary conditions or regulations, to provide a formal means short of violation and revocation proceedings for the probationer to have ambiguous conditions or regulations clarified, to provide added flexibility to the probation process, and on the suggestion of probation officials, to provide a means for invoking the authority of the court when the probationer seems to be slipping toward a revocation without risking that ultimate sanction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marunich v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.