23 Ariz. App. 376 - Lloyd v. Lloyd’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2012
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ryan v. United States Lines Co. · Cummings v. Lockwood · Barnett v. Barnett · 17 Ariz. App. 101 - Bennett v. Bennett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It seems that the type of final judgment to which clause (5) of Rule 60(c) is most often applied is one providing for injunctive relief. Other types of final judgments may have a continuing effect and be subject to modification in their prospective application, such as continued enforcement of liens or a declaratory judgment directed to matters in the future. However, where the final judgment is an award of money, Rule 60(c)(5) would not be applicable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[Husband shall] pay to [Wife] the sum of $6,000.00, payable in installments of $100.00 or more each month beginning August 1, 1971 until paid”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.