In re Van Dyke’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
Relationships
Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · 63 Ill. App. 2d 96 - Silverman v. Chicago Ramada Inn, Inc. · 85 Ill. App. 3d 1108 - Anvil Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Thornhill Condominiums, Ltd. · 23 Ill. App. 2d 446 - Meihsner v. Runyon · 92 Ill. App. 2d 141 - Curtis v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Should you decide to accept this offer of rescission, kindly return the above described securities to this office together with a written notice of your election to accept said offer of rescission and the purchase price plus interest will be refunded to you. (App. 19)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“for a price equal to the full amount paid therefor plus interest thereon and less any income thereon as set forth in subsection A of this Section”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Van Dyke“shall contain such further information, if any, as the Secretary of State may prescribe,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Van Dyke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.