Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

23 Cal. 268

Holmes v. Ohm

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1863

California Supreme Court · decided 1863-07-01

<p>Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1863-07-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 1949

17 state decisions — followed in 10 states

60186318701880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Crocker, J.

¶1delivered the opinion of the Court—Norton, J. concurring.

¶2This Is an action upon an undertaking on appeal. The defendants demurred to the complaint, on the ground that it did not aver any delivery. The complaint avers that the defendants executed the undertaking sued on, copying the same in full into the complaint, with the indorsement thereon, showing that the undertaking was filed in the Clerk’s office on the twenty-seventh day of March, 1862. This is clearly sufficient to entitle the plaintiff" to recover thereon. These undertakings are not required by the statute to be delivered to the obligee when executed, but to be filed in the Clerk’s office, for the use and benefit of the parties entitled to them.

¶3The judgment is therefore affirmed.

/23/cal/268 · .json · Public domain