Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 Cal. 3d 630 - Dew v. Appleberry

23 Cal. 3d 630 - Dew v. Appleberry’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2017 · most notably Searle Company v. Cohn (1982), 54 Cal. 3d 288 - Nickelsberg v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (1991)

5 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

31019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bauserman v. Blunt · Bollinger v. National Fire Insurance · 22 Cal. 3d 493 - Scherling v. Superior Court · Williams v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority · 1 Cal. 3d 207 - In Re White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “These provisions evidence the Legislature’s recognition that the availability of personal jurisdiction may remove the necessity for suspending the statute of limitations. If the Legislature intends that the tolling provision not extend the limitations period whenever the defendant is amenable to jurisdiction, it can easily so state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Lund v. Hall
  2. “the time of his absence is not part of the time limited for the commencement of the action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Martin Karl Maurer v. Individually and as Members of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Peter J. Pitchess, John P. Owens
  3. “[a]n action for ... injury to ... one caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 541 F. Supp. 805 - Renfroe v. Eli Lilly & Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.