Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 Cal. App. 290 - People v. Dadmun

23 Cal. App. 290 - People v. Dadmun’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
November 1998
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 1998

9 state decisions

20191319201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hoag v. Howard · Foorman v. Wallace · Warnock v. Harlow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the thing stolen consists of any evidence of debt, or other written instrument, the amount of money due thereupon, or secured to be paid thereby, and remaining unsatisfied, or which in any contingency might be collected thereon, or the value of the property the title to which is shown thereby, or the sum which might be recovered in the absence thereof, is the value of the thing stolen.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.