Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 CALAPP2D 57 - Lesem v. Getty

Lesem v. Getty’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1984
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte Haskell · Fowler v. Bebee · Harry Mulcrevy v. City and County of San Francisco · Carleton v. People · Reuter v. Bd. of Supervisors of San Mateo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Reuter v. Board of Supervisors, 220 Cal. 314, 326 [30 PaCal.2d 417], the court in dealing with another question arising out of the provisions of this same charter, said: 'The general purpose of section 7 1/2 of article XI of the Constitution was to give local self-government or county home rule to counties of the state by means of charters framed under said constitutional amendment. That this was the intent and purpose of the section clearly appears from the language of the section itself, which declares that, after the charter has been approved by the legislature”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.