23 Cal. App. 4th 1530 - Kohn v. Jaymar-Ruby, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2011
1 federal appellate · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 17 Cal. 3d 500 - Riley v. Bear Creek Planning Committee · Pacific Grove-Asilomar Operating Corp. v. County of Monterey · 147 Cal. App. 3d 128 - Gopal v. Yoshikawa · Richardson v. Richardson · 182 Cal. App. 3d 561 - Fiore v. Alvord
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]he concern addressed by the statute of frauds is not present when, as here, a neutral court participates in the settlement process by assisting the parties to formulate the terms of the settlement. In so doing, the court assures itself that the parties are being truthful and acting in good faith, and also that they each comprehend the scope of the agreement.” Kohn, 23 Cal. App. 4th at 1535 , 28 Cal. Rptr. 2d at 782 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[e]very agreement that by its terms is not to be performed within one (1) year from the making thereof”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.