Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 CALAPP4TH 76 - People v. Martin

People v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 42 Cal. 3d 284 - People v. Barnes · 36 Cal. 3d 441 - Williams v. Superior Court · 48 Cal. 3d 632 - Frank v. Superior Court · 119 Cal. App. 3d 644 - People v. Bracamonte · People v. Gamez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]here was no need for, and in fact, no reasonable way to bifurcate the enhancement allegation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the same witnesses (gang members) and much of the same evidence used to prove the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.