Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 COLO 202 - Riethmann v. Godsman

Riethmann v. Godsman’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
April 1983
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 1983

11 state decisions

601896190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parker v. . Conner · Dyett v. . Hyman · Stearns v. . Gage · Kyle v. Ward · Grimes v. Hill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It would seem, under the authority of these cases, that the purchaser for a valuable consideration without previous notice is not chargeable with constructive notice of the fraudulent intent of his vendor; but under these authorities, as well as under former decisions of this court (Smith v. Jensen, 13 Colo. 213 ; Grimes v. Hill, 15 Colo. 359 ; and Steeleman v. Hoagland, 19 Colo. 231), knowledge of circumstances may be equivalent to actual notice.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.