Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 COLO 287 - Sawyer v. Armstrong

Sawyer v. Armstrong’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
January 1992
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1992

5 state decisions

2018961900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Exchange Bank v. Ford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘obligation’ is a generic word, and, when used in its broadest sense, includes all kinds of contracts by which a person may become bound, •and should be so construed, unless, from the connection in which it is used, it is to be gathered that the legislature intended to give it a more limited signification * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.