Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 CONNAPP 602 - State v. Burns

State v. Burns’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably State v. Rumore (1992), State v. Lee (1993)

37 state decisions

190199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Delli Paoli v. United States · State v. Piskorski · State v. Pollitt · State v. Haskins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] passenger in a motor vehicle, who fails to demonstrate a possessory interest in the car itself or in any of the seized evidence, has no reasonable expectation of privacy in the area of the vehicle searched, and thus, he is precluded from contesting the validity of the search”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he defendant did not show that he subjectively believed that the bag would remain hidden either by introducing direct evidence of his belief, or by introducing circumstantial evidence from which the trial court could have inferred such a belief. Nor did he introduce evidence showing that any subjective expectation of privacy that he had was reasonable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “because [defendant] has not been able to establish an expectation of privacy in the area of the automobile that was searched, he has no standing to challenge the constitutionality of the search”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.