23 Conn. Super. Ct. 113 - Dunn v. Ives’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “I . . . at present do not know the full extent of my injuries”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 6945 - Howser v. Town of New Milford, No. Cv 99 0078821 (Jun. 14, 1999) · 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 6676 - Norwalk Co-Op v. Town of Greenwich, No. Cv90 0267800s (Jul. 15, 1992)

2. “The purpose of the requirement of notice is `to furnish the party against whom a claim was to be made such warning as would prompt him to make such inquiries as he might deem necessary or prudent for the preservation of his interests, and such information as would furnish him a reasonable guide in the conduct of such inquiries, and in obtaining such information as he might deem helpful for his protection.' Cassidy v. Southbury, 86 Conn. 45 , 49 , 84 A. 291 [1912].”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Shine v. Powers

3. “The giving of a notice sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the statute is a condition precedent to the maintenance of an action under it.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Shine v. Powers