Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 DELCH 321 - Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp.

Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
12
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 90 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently March 2012 · most notably Braden v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (2009), New York Trust Co. v. Riley (1940)

1 federal appellate · 90 state decisions — followed in 12 states

270193919401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pimpinello v. Swift & Co. · Slack v. Rees · Hall v. Otterson · Brown v. Mercantile Trust & Deposit Co. · Peyton v. Wehrhane

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Confidential relations are presumed to exist between husband and wife. . Confidential and fiduciary relations have the same meaning in law; and as every fiduciary relation implies a condition of superiority of one of the parties over the other, equity raises a presumption against the validity of a transaction by which the superior obtains a possible benefit at the expense of the inferior, and casts upon him the burden of showing affirmatively his compliance with all equitable requisites.” Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp., 2 Del.Ch. 321 , 7 A.2d 737, 747 , 123 A.L.R. 1482 (1939).”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “substantial injury to her property interests”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.