Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 F.1d 65 - Foster v. Seymour

Foster v. Seymour’s Empirical Analysis

23 F. 65 · 1885

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
March 1935
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1935

2 federal appellate ·

40188518901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hawes v. Oakland · Scovill v. Thayer · Burrall v. . Bushwick Railroad Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There was no fraud on the corporation. At the time the scrip was exchanged for the mining property, the trustees were all there were of the-corporation. There were no stockholders unless they were stockholders. What was done was done by the corporation. By the exchange the corporation got the mining property, and gave it back again to those from whom it got it, divided into 100,000 shares of the nominal value of §100 each.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.