Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 F.2d 357 - Backus v. Finkelstein

Backus v. Finkelstein’s Empirical Analysis

23 F.2d 357 · 1927

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
11
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 3 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably Kroese v. General Steel Castings Corp. (1950), Landstrom v. Shaver (1997)

7 federal appellate · 3 district · 16 state decisions — followed in 11 states

8019271930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Twin-Lick Oil Company v. Marbury · Burnrite Coal Briquette Co. v. Riggs · Thomas v. Matthiessen · Neblett v. Macfarland · Murray v. . Beard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * For obvious reasons, it may be highly improper to direct that the moneys here recovered on behalf of the corporation shall be paid into the treasury thereof. That might be paying the moneys back into the custody and control of those from whom the recovery is had. It might defeat effectually the purpose of the suit and be the beginning of another prolonged cycle of litigation. Unless conditions shall ensue which will materially change the situation, the distribution, so far as possible, should be directly to the individuals who will ultimately be entitled thereto." 23 F.2d at 366 .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.