Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 F.2d 428 - In re Schreiber

In re Schreiber’s Empirical Analysis

23 F.2d 428 · 1928

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
September 2009
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently September 2009

10 federal appellate · 1 district ·

70192819301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 110

Relies on Phelps v. McDonald · Johnson v. Collier · James Kinder v. Edward Scharff · Bilafsky v. Abraham · Duncan v. Watson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The notion which underlies the bankrupt's argument is really that section 11(d) bars any proceeding which the trustee hereafter to be elected may bring to compel the bankrupt to account, and therefore there is no unadministered asset, without which the reopening of an estate is not only futile, but unauthorized. It would seem to be a sufficient answer to reply that the defense of the 2-year limitation should be raised in the proceeding which the trustee may hereafter bring, rather than by motion to vacate the order reopening the estate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “d. Suits shall not be brought by or against a trustee of a bankrupt estate subsequent to two years after the estate has been closed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.