In re Rosen’s Empirical Analysis
23 F.2d 687 · 1928
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 1948
2 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bailey v. Baker Ice Machine Co. · Holt v. Crucible Steel Company of America · Dyson v. Simmons · Thomas Roberts & Co. v. Robinson · Charles M. Stieff, Inc. v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The purpose of the law is obviously to protect creditors who subsequently trust the buyer on the faith of his ostensible ownership, and to compel the seller to record his lien in order to preserve it.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Wilhelm
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.