Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 F.2d 997 - Elliott v. White

Elliott v. White’s Empirical Analysis

23 F.2d 997 · 1928

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
January 1981
most recently cited

7 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1981

7 district · 2 state decisions

601928193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 161

Relies on Massachusetts v. Mellon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Looking through forms of words to the substance of their complaint, it is merely that officials of the executive department of the government are executing and will execute an act of Congress asserted to be unconstitutional, and this we are asked to prevent. To do so would be not to decide a judicial controversy, but to assume a position of authority over the governmental acts of another and coequal department, an authority which plainly we do not possess.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the chaplains of the senate and house of representatives.” Id. § 6. This statute, amended in 1872, 1879, 1913, 1920, and 1948, is the predecessor to G. L. c. 3, § 14. 12 But cf. James Madison’s views on the equal protection issue in his Detached Memoranda, supra note 9:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.