Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 23 F.3d 1052 - Day v. Shalala

Day v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis

23 F.3d 1052 · 1994

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Grand Central Partnership, Inc. v. Cuomo (1999), Gilbert v. Shalala (1995)

24 federal appellate · 4 district ·

310199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 421 (§ 221 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 7410 · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act)

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Mathews v. Eldridge · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Goldberg v. Kelly · Califano v. Sanders

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “failed to satisfy the requirements of due process, the only claimants who could have been injured by the inadequacy are those who detrimentally relied on the inadequate denial notice”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If you do not request a hearing of your case within the prescribed time period, you still have the right to file another application at any time.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Any individual, after any final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him of notice of such decision or within such further time as the Commissioner of Social Security may allow.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.