O'Connor v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis
23 F.3d 1232 · 1994
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2010
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Shalala v. Schaefer · Melkonyan v. Sullivan · Herron v. Shalala · Damato v. Sullivan · Campbell v. Shalala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Congress has not provided for direct circuit court review of social security disability determinations; in a process that has been criticized as 'cumbersome and duplicative,' the district court conducts an appellate review of the Secretary's decision, and we then review the district court's judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crow v. Shalala
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.